Accountability for Terrorism in Asian Organizations; Challenges and Regional Cooperation After September 11, 2001

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Associate Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Arak University, Arak, Iran

10.22099/ijas.2025.52971.1035

Abstract

Introduction

After the events of September 11, 2001, the Asia region became the focal point of international efforts to combat terrorism and enhance security. However, regional approaches to this issue face challenges such as the diversity and complexity of terrorist threats. While the efforts of Asian countries through regional institutions and the adoption of various documents have been effective, they have not fully mitigated threats from groups such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Furthermore, the increasing use of advanced technologies by terrorist groups has further complicated these threats. On the other hand, counterterrorism actions in some Asian countries are constrained by legal and human rights limitations, making the fight against terrorism more difficult.



Methodology

This study, using an analytical-descriptive method and based on document analysis, explores the responses of Asian institutions to terrorist threats within the framework of regionalism. The challenges and actions of Asian countries are assessed, and the impact of regional documents and their limitations in combating terrorism is examined. The main objective of this study is to analyze the performance of Asian institutions and the challenges they face in addressing transnational threats.



Findings

Regionalism in security matters, particularly in combating terrorism, has become one of the key issues in recent years. The United Nations has urged regional institutions to play a more active role in the fight against terrorism. Regional treaties and agreements are typically crafted based on the geographic, cultural, and religious characteristics of the member states. The relationship between regional law and international law is complex, and in some cases, national regulations can influence regional regulations. In instances where international law is underdeveloped, regional law can be effective in filling these gaps.

Asian countries have made significant contributions by introducing updated definitions and international regulations regarding the fight against terrorism. In this regard, intelligence and security cooperation has been recognized as one of the most effective tools to combat terrorist threats. Asian regional organizations such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), ASEAN, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), despite geopolitical and religious challenges, have worked to facilitate the fight against terrorism through regional approaches.

Therefore, one of the most important solutions in the fight against terrorism is to strengthen intelligence and security cooperation among Asian countries. These countries must effectively exchange information related to terrorist threats through regional mechanisms. Additionally, the establishment of common conventions and strengthening judicial cooperation can reduce legal gaps between different countries. Strengthening diplomacy and international dialogues can also improve political and cultural relations among various nations.

Nevertheless, to effectively and comprehensively combat terrorism, regional organizations and their member states need to provide a coordinated and inclusive response. Establishing cooperation structures for intelligence sharing, aligning anti-terrorism laws, and strengthening regional diplomacy could reduce terrorist threats and enhance regional security.



Conclusion

One of the main challenges in the fight against terrorism is the lack of a common definition and international consensus regarding the criminalization of terrorism. Transnational criminal cooperation in combating terrorism, especially in the Asian region, faces challenges such as a lack of coordination in intelligence and judicial matters. These challenges lead to the emergence of double standards and failures in effectively addressing terrorist threats. Although regional organizations such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, ASEAN, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation have made progress in this area, there is still a need to strengthen operational and intelligence cooperation. Enhancing these collaborations and developing regional diplomacy could contribute to improving security and effectively combating terrorism in the region.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Akindele, R. (1972). Regional Treaties and the UN Charter: A Study in Comparative Law of International Institutions, Malaya Law Review, 14: 61.
Ali, R. (2019) Countering terrorism in South Asia: Pakistan's approach, South Asian Security Review, 12(2): 45-67.
Arndt, M. (2013). India’s Foreign Policy and Regional Multilateralism, Critical Studies of the Asia Pacific, Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 59–75.
Bakker, E. (2016). The role of international cooperation in counterterrorism: The case of Asia, Journal of Security Studies, 23(4): 123-140.
Borelli, M. (2017) ASEAN Counter-terrorism Weaknesses, Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, Published by International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research, 9(9): 14-20.
D’Amato, A. (1969). The Concept of Special Custom in International Law, American Journal of International Law, 63: 211.
Das, S. & Priyotosh Sharma (2021). A Study on the Role of ASEAN in Combating Terrorism, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education and Research, 10(7): 1-14.
Gunaratna, R., and Gloria Cheung (2020). Regional Legal Responses to Terrorism in Asia and the Pacific, in Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism, by Ben Saul, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Harakan, A., AKM Ahsan U. & Meliyana P. (2024). Post-ISIS Terrorism in Southeast Asia: Regional Insecurity and Islamophobia Promotion and Implications for Migration, in: Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Security in Asia, Springer Nature, 10-17.
Izarali, M. Raymond, Dalbir A. (2021). Terrorism, Security and Development in South Asia: National, Regional and Global Implications, Routledge.
Janis, M. (1975). The Roles of Regional Law of the Sea, San Diego Law Review, 12: 553, 554.
Koh, H. (2021). Counter-terrorism cooperation in ASEAN: A case study, Asian Security Studies, 12(2): 134-145.
Koskenniemi, M. ed. (2000). Sources of International Law, Ashgate, Dartmouth.
Kumar, S. (2018). India’s anti-terrorism measures: An analysis, South Asian Political Studies, 19(3): 58-75.
Mehta, K. (2019). Diplomatic solutions to terrorism: The role of dialogue in Asia, Asian Journal of International Relations, 30(1): 67-82.
Miller, R. (2022). The Gulf Cooperation Council and Counter-Terror Cooperation in the Post-9/11 Era: A Regional Organization in Comparative Perspective, Middle Eastern Studies, 3(58): 435-451.
Periani, A. & Dewa G. (2018). Implementation of ASEAN Convention on Counter Terrorism in Eradication of Terrorism that Happens in the South Asia Area, Journal of International Business and Economics, 17(4): 1-12.
Ragab, E. (2016). The Gulf Cooperation Council Countries and Countering ISIS: Threats, Policies and Challenges, Contemporary Arab Affairs, 9(4): 577-595.
Saul, B. (2006). The Dangers of the United Nations’ New Security Agenda: Collective and Regional Security in the Asia-Pacific Region, Asian Journal of Comparative Law 1: 147.
Talai, F. and Javidbakht, A. (2022). Evaluating the role of South and Southeast Asian Regional Organizations in Combating Maritime Terrorism: A case study of York, BIMSTEC and ASEAN, International Organizations, 2(5): 279-310. [In Persian]
Wicaksana, I. (2019). Militarising Counterterrorism in Southeast Asia, European Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(2): 205-235.
Yeo, K. (2022). As Southeast Asia Reopens, Will Transnational Terrorism Return? The Diplomat (South East Asia, 15 April 2022) <https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/as-southeast-asia-reopens-will-transnational-terrorismreturn/>
Yusuf, M. (2022). Counter-terrorism measures in Central Asia: A comprehensive analysis, Central Asian Security Journal, 8(1): 50-67.
  • Receive Date: 18 April 2025
  • Revise Date: 24 October 2025
  • Accept Date: 01 July 2025
  • First Publish Date: 13 November 2025
  • Publish Date: 22 May 2026